🎉 NEW soft, tangy, delicious corn & soy free goat chevre! BUY CHEVRE.

Does humane treatment really mean what you think it does?

written by

Marie Reedell

posted on

February 26, 2021

Being “humane” means that humans have compassion, sympathy, and consideration for their treatment of animals. Especially given the awful state of modern conventional farming, this is really really important!!!

You may have seen the “certified humane” label on products. This label is managed by Humane Farm Animal Care, a not-for-profit organization that’s one of the largest proponents for humane treatment of animals. 

Although many large and small farms have become “certified humane”, Miller’s Bio Farm is NOT interested and probably never will be. It’s for the same reasons we aren’t “certified organic” and probably never will be (you can refresh your memory about why we’re sadly not organic here).

On a broad stroke basis, Miller’s Bio Farm checks all the boxes to be certified humane. Here’s an overview of the standards:

✔️ Access to wholesome and nutritious feed

✔️Appropriate environmental design

✔️ Caring and responsible planning and management

✔️Skilled, knowledgeable, and conscientious animal care

✔️Considerate handling, transport, and slaughter 

But, when you get into the nitty gritty details, Miller’s only fits in with 99% of the requirements. We don’t want to be held back… even 1%. We want to respond to the unique and individual needs on our farm. Here are a couple examples.

The “certified humane” guidelines say that “tethering of cattle is prohibited.” But, at Miller’s Bio Farm, tethering cattle when they’re in the barn is the most humane way to treat the dairy cows for a few big reasons.

Tethering cows in the barn allows us to easily keep the floors clean and dry. Cows aren’t like humans - they poop and pee wherever and whenever. When clipped in, the feces and urine go (mostly) into a trough behind them. This keeps the floors clean and dry, the cows healthy, and the milk great tasting and clean. It also preserves the manure, which is used to fertilize the fields.

When tethered in a stall, the cows get the food they need. The farmer can make sure each cow gets enough food. The bossy cow doesn’t get the most or push other cows away from the food. It also becomes easy to give cows supplements to fit their individual needs. 

Lastly, tethering cows is safe. There is little chance of a cow stepping on another cow or hurting their hoof in the gutter or stepping on a person. Each cow and human has their own place and their own job in the barn.

The “certified humane” guidelines say that pigs should be kept at a minimum of 50 F. The pigs at Miller’s Bio Farm live outside, and in the winter, it does get below 50 F.

Now, of course, if pigs are kept confined in a building with a manufactured floor, sure, warmer temperatures are important. But, if they live in their natural habitat with the resources they need, this rule need not apply.

Domesticated pigs were bred from wild boars, which are native to forests in regions that have cold winters. They are meant to live in the cold. 

Farmer Aaron reports that the pigs on Miller’s Bio Farm don’t seem stressed by the winter.  

What they do is dig a deep pit with ridges around it to keep water out. They all get in and cuddle. When the pigs are fed, they all pop out and a big cloud of steam rises up. They are definitely warm in there!

This seems the most natural way to raise pigs, and farmer Aaron wouldn’t change a thing.

Then, there are things that are allowed under the “certified humane” label that Miller’s Bio Farm thinks are inhumane and chooses NOT to do. 

Just a few examples are feeding animals soy and grain, feeding calves milk replacer (milk and whey powder), finishing cattle in feedyards, vaccination, and lack of enough access to outdoors.

If you value the humane treatment of animals, it’s not about the label. It’s about trusting the ethics of the farmer your food comes from.

In my opinion, there’s no such thing as one size fits all. Not for any farm, not for any medication or vaccination, not for any diet, not for anyone or anything. It’s about compassion, sympathy, and consideration for each unique situation.

Opinion

Farming Practices

More from the blog

Raw milk or fermented dairy and lactose intolerance. Why might it help?

I was misinformed. At some point, I read that raw milk contains lactase. As it turns out, this is not true! It is true that raw milk contains many live enzymes that are inactivated during pasteurization. But, what about lactase? I’ve heard many anecdotal stories from people who are lactose intolerant... but can handle raw milk or fermented dairy. If raw milk, yogurt, kefir, or cheese doesn’t contain lactase, then why is that?

Our bone broth tested negative-ish for heavy metals 🥳 NATURAL AND CLEAN

Over the past few months a bunch of people asked us if we tested our bone broth for toxic heavy metals. When we get the same question a lot, we of course look into it. My first question was --- Is there an issue with toxic metals in bone broth? As it turns out, yes, there "can" be an issue! Heavy metals are naturally present in our environment. We need the "good" heavy metals to thrive: iron, zinc, magnesium, copper, etc. But, we can 100% do without the toxic heavy metals: arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury, etc. Too many toxic heavy metals can lead to a host of pretty awful issues: nervous system damage, cardiovascular issues, cancer, endocrine disruption, kidney damage, and so on. Our body is designed to excrete heavy metals through urine (and a little bit through sweat, hair, and breastmilk too)... but only so much. There's a limit. If you're overloaded, your body will store those heavy metals in your bones, blood, tissues, and organs. Similarly, if an animal is exposed to heavy metals via food, water, air, dust, or soil, those heavy metals accumulate in the bones. Maybe the farm's soil or air is contaminated from a nearby factory. Maybe the pipes for the water has lead solder connecting them. Maybe the feed a farm is buying was grown on contaminated soil or processed on contaminated equipment.  And, of course, a main purpose of bone broth is drawing out as much as possible from the bones. If there are heavy metals in bones, they will make their way into the broth. This is especially true when you pre-soak with apple cider vinegar and simmer for 48 hours to make it thick and gelatinous (like our broth). And that led me to my second question --- Should I be concerned about every bone broth? Where is the fear coming from? Well... it seems it might be a little political. There was a study done in the UK in 2013 that scared a lot of people. It's titled "The Risk of Lead Contamination in Bone Broth Diets". This study found high levels of lead in organic chicken bone broth, which is quite concerning. And, in fact, this one study is still cited in articles written today! Let's dig a little deeper. Let's go farther than the short abstract. Here are the broths tested in the study and their test results for lead:  (9.5 parts per billion): Broth made from tap water plus skin and cartilage(7.01 parts per billion): Broth made from tap water plus bones(2.3 parts per billion): Broth made from tap water plus meat(0.89 parts per billion): Tap water alone cooked for the same amount of time as a control. But, they only used organic chicken from one farm. And, there's zero information about that farm, their practices, the feed, and the broth recipe. Did they use vinegar or wine in the broth? Was the chicken's water contaminated with lead? What was the quality of the feed and the soil? Were the chickens raised indoors or outdoors? So many unanswered questions! All we get is that it was one "organic chicken" that created a lead issue with broth. Another curious thing is that the broth with skin and cartilage contained more lead than the broth made with just bones. Bones are where lead is stored, so why wouldn't the broth made with bones only contain more lead? It's an odd result. Moreover, the abstract of the study specifically called out "bone broth diets" like GAPS and paleo. They even go so far as to write, "In view of the dangers of lead consumption to the human body, we recommend that doctors and nutritionists take the risk of lead contamination into consideration when advising patients about bone broth diets." That's quite curious. Why are they worried about these diets? Are the researchers anti healing through food? Who funded the research? Is it political? My opinion? This study is not comprehensive. It does not speak to all bone broths. But it does cover a potential issue if the water or animals are overloaded with heavy metals. What I glean from this study is that we need more research. We don't need fear to spread and people to stop drinking broth from this one study. Regardless of whether the fear was fabricated or legit, we tested our bone broth anyway. After all, it's always nice to validate that your food choices are as clean as you think. For Miller's, here were my concerns before testing: What if there's mercury in the fishmeal in our chicken feed?What if the soil that our animals live on is contaminated?What is the well water that the broth is made with is contaminated?What if the Celtic sea salt has lots of heavy metals? We got the test results back. I was super excited. But, I was also confused. At face value, it appeared that our bone broth tested NEGATIVE for arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury. You can find the test results right here! You'll notice that, for every sample, the results are "<0.01 mg/kg" and "<0.02 mg/kg".  I asked the lab what the "<" means. They said that it indicates their limit of quantitation (LOQ), the lowest concentration that can be accurately tested using the test procedure in that sample type. So the results simply report that none of the metals tested were found in the sample above the specific reporting LOQs. Whether or not they were present below this LOQ is information that is not provided by the test. When talking to the lab, I told them what we needed and assumed that this test would go below a 1 ppb. So, when the results came in, I assumed that a "mg/kg" was the same as a part per billion (ppb). Ummm... that math wasn't write! A "mg/kg" is actually a part per million (ppm). That means that the test we ran had results saying that the broth had less than 0.02 ppm (or 20 ppb) of arsenic and lead. And, it had less than 0.01 ppm (or 10 ppb) of cadmium and mercury. For some reference, the EPA says that less than 15 ppb of lead is safe in drinking water. Not saying that I agree, but it's a good reference point.  These results are good. It means the broth definitely isn't overloaded with toxic heavy metals. But, it's not good enough!!! We need to test again! We really need to a lower LOQ. We need to know the results with an accuracy of as low as 1 ppb. It looks like the lab we sent the original samples to doesn't have an LOQ that low. So here I am on the hunt for a lab to do it again. As soon as I can, I'll send samples in again and paying for more expensive testing to get the info you deserve. Stay tuned! I hope to have the new results in by the end of April 2025. Do you worry about toxic metals (or other junk) in your food? Where have your fears stemmed from? I'd love to hear from you. You can comment below (no account required) or contact us 😊 ----- Sources The risk of lead contamination in bone broth dietsBone Broth and Lead Toxicity: Should You Be Concerned?Bone Broth and Lead Contamination: A Very Flawed Study in Medical HypothesesBone Broth, Collagen, and Toxic Metals: A Research Review