🎉 NEW soft, tangy, delicious corn & soy free goat chevre! BUY CHEVRE.

How old do you need to be to raise chickens?

written by

Marie Reedell

posted on

June 5, 2020

I visited the farm last week. It was such a nice change to my family’s “groundhog day” life for the past few months.

I have three little kids, and they reported that the most exciting part of the visit was the chicks. While we were there, the farmer got 500 baby chicks and 150 baby turkey poults. Wow that’s a lot of cuteness!

Farmer Aaron’s kids led my kids in helping unload the chicks and poults from the boxes and gently placing them in the well prepared greenhouse. 

The farmer’s sons Ben (11yo) and John (9yo) are raising the chickens this summer. 


The farmer gave them some entrepreneurial incentive. They will earn $0.10 per bird that reaches maturity and is processed. If the birds reach 5 lbs in 8 weeks, they get a bonus of $0.01 per bird. And, if the birds reach 6 lbs in 8 weeks, they get a super bonus of $0.05 per bird.

So, let’s do the math. With 500 chicks, that’s the potential to earn $75!

Farmer Aaron knows his kids are ready for the challenge, and that’s why they were passed this responsibility. It’s parent intuition. 


The boys were the ones who readied the greenhouse. They laid a bed of peat, placed feeders and filled them with a specially formulated soy-free feed, set up the watering trays, and turned on the heater.

They will make sure the chickens are fed and watered. They will make sure the temperature is ideal. They will transfer them to the mobile coops when the time comes. 

In addition, they need to make sure the foxes and raccoons stay away. That means making sure the dog is around the chickens at night.

However, tragedy struck. The day after the chicks arrived, a few were found dead in the greenhouse. I saw the dismay on the boys’ faces. 


Despite all their diligence and hard work, it was as if they had failed. And that can be a difficult thing to deal with... at any age. 

The boys quickly took action and told their dad. 


Farmer Aaron called Fertrell, the feed company, who reported many farmers were experiencing the same thing this year. You see, the chicks are delivered in the mail, and, due to the virus or whatever, they were one day late. One day longer without food and water took a big toll on the little chicks.

Per the feed company’s advice, they laid down feed on newspaper to make it more easily accessible. They also divided the space they had to roam to make sure they were kept close to the heater. And, they hooked up an additional watering system in the greenhouse.

I saw the boys pick up the birds and move them closer to the feed or dip their beaks in the water. They did everything they could to make sure they were fed and hydrated.

But, you know, they still lost a few more chicks. 

These are real life lessons. This is real experiential education.


So much is learned from being passed a responsibility like raising chickens. 

Ben and John are learning hard skills. For example, they must know how to read a thermometer, how to count chickens, how to weigh a chicken, and how to do addition, subtraction, and multiplication. 

The kids are also learning soft skills. They need to follow instructions, take responsibility for daily tasks, do hard work in all weather, notice changes, problem solve, and know when to ask for help. 

I was really inspired by watching farmer Aaron’s kids. So, I started to pass some more tasks at home to my children. 


In the morning, I dole out watering the plants, feeding the fish and hamster, cooking breakfast, and unloading the dishwasher. My husband built a small suburban-sized chicken coop and plan to have the kids help with the chickens, too!

What do you do (or have you done) in your home to teach your kids real life skills? I’d love to hear from you!


PS: We are low on chicken inventory right now but have plenty of pastured beef and pork in stock. We should be getting more chicken in stock in late June. These are Ben and John's second clutch of chickens this season!

Pastured Meat

Opinion

More from the blog

Raw milk or fermented dairy and lactose intolerance. Why might it help?

I was misinformed. At some point, I read that raw milk contains lactase. As it turns out, this is not true! It is true that raw milk contains many live enzymes that are inactivated during pasteurization. But, what about lactase? I’ve heard many anecdotal stories from people who are lactose intolerant... but can handle raw milk or fermented dairy. If raw milk, yogurt, kefir, or cheese doesn’t contain lactase, then why is that?

Our bone broth tested negative-ish for heavy metals 🥳 NATURAL AND CLEAN

Over the past few months a bunch of people asked us if we tested our bone broth for toxic heavy metals. When we get the same question a lot, we of course look into it. My first question was --- Is there an issue with toxic metals in bone broth? As it turns out, yes, there "can" be an issue! Heavy metals are naturally present in our environment. We need the "good" heavy metals to thrive: iron, zinc, magnesium, copper, etc. But, we can 100% do without the toxic heavy metals: arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury, etc. Too many toxic heavy metals can lead to a host of pretty awful issues: nervous system damage, cardiovascular issues, cancer, endocrine disruption, kidney damage, and so on. Our body is designed to excrete heavy metals through urine (and a little bit through sweat, hair, and breastmilk too)... but only so much. There's a limit. If you're overloaded, your body will store those heavy metals in your bones, blood, tissues, and organs. Similarly, if an animal is exposed to heavy metals via food, water, air, dust, or soil, those heavy metals accumulate in the bones. Maybe the farm's soil or air is contaminated from a nearby factory. Maybe the pipes for the water has lead solder connecting them. Maybe the feed a farm is buying was grown on contaminated soil or processed on contaminated equipment.  And, of course, a main purpose of bone broth is drawing out as much as possible from the bones. If there are heavy metals in bones, they will make their way into the broth. This is especially true when you pre-soak with apple cider vinegar and simmer for 48 hours to make it thick and gelatinous (like our broth). And that led me to my second question --- Should I be concerned about every bone broth? Where is the fear coming from? Well... it seems it might be a little political. There was a study done in the UK in 2013 that scared a lot of people. It's titled "The Risk of Lead Contamination in Bone Broth Diets". This study found high levels of lead in organic chicken bone broth, which is quite concerning. And, in fact, this one study is still cited in articles written today! Let's dig a little deeper. Let's go farther than the short abstract. Here are the broths tested in the study and their test results for lead:  (9.5 parts per billion): Broth made from tap water plus skin and cartilage(7.01 parts per billion): Broth made from tap water plus bones(2.3 parts per billion): Broth made from tap water plus meat(0.89 parts per billion): Tap water alone cooked for the same amount of time as a control. But, they only used organic chicken from one farm. And, there's zero information about that farm, their practices, the feed, and the broth recipe. Did they use vinegar or wine in the broth? Was the chicken's water contaminated with lead? What was the quality of the feed and the soil? Were the chickens raised indoors or outdoors? So many unanswered questions! All we get is that it was one "organic chicken" that created a lead issue with broth. Another curious thing is that the broth with skin and cartilage contained more lead than the broth made with just bones. Bones are where lead is stored, so why wouldn't the broth made with bones only contain more lead? It's an odd result. Moreover, the abstract of the study specifically called out "bone broth diets" like GAPS and paleo. They even go so far as to write, "In view of the dangers of lead consumption to the human body, we recommend that doctors and nutritionists take the risk of lead contamination into consideration when advising patients about bone broth diets." That's quite curious. Why are they worried about these diets? Are the researchers anti healing through food? Who funded the research? Is it political? My opinion? This study is not comprehensive. It does not speak to all bone broths. But it does cover a potential issue if the water or animals are overloaded with heavy metals. What I glean from this study is that we need more research. We don't need fear to spread and people to stop drinking broth from this one study. Regardless of whether the fear was fabricated or legit, we tested our bone broth anyway. After all, it's always nice to validate that your food choices are as clean as you think. For Miller's, here were my concerns before testing: What if there's mercury in the fishmeal in our chicken feed?What if the soil that our animals live on is contaminated?What is the well water that the broth is made with is contaminated?What if the Celtic sea salt has lots of heavy metals? We got the test results back. I was super excited. But, I was also confused. At face value, it appeared that our bone broth tested NEGATIVE for arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury. You can find the test results right here! You'll notice that, for every sample, the results are "<0.01 mg/kg" and "<0.02 mg/kg".  I asked the lab what the "<" means. They said that it indicates their limit of quantitation (LOQ), the lowest concentration that can be accurately tested using the test procedure in that sample type. So the results simply report that none of the metals tested were found in the sample above the specific reporting LOQs. Whether or not they were present below this LOQ is information that is not provided by the test. When talking to the lab, I told them what we needed and assumed that this test would go below a 1 ppb. So, when the results came in, I assumed that a "mg/kg" was the same as a part per billion (ppb). Ummm... that math wasn't write! A "mg/kg" is actually a part per million (ppm). That means that the test we ran had results saying that the broth had less than 0.02 ppm (or 20 ppb) of arsenic and lead. And, it had less than 0.01 ppm (or 10 ppb) of cadmium and mercury. For some reference, the EPA says that less than 15 ppb of lead is safe in drinking water. Not saying that I agree, but it's a good reference point.  These results are good. It means the broth definitely isn't overloaded with toxic heavy metals. But, it's not good enough!!! We need to test again! We really need to a lower LOQ. We need to know the results with an accuracy of as low as 1 ppb. It looks like the lab we sent the original samples to doesn't have an LOQ that low. So here I am on the hunt for a lab to do it again. As soon as I can, I'll send samples in again and paying for more expensive testing to get the info you deserve. Stay tuned! I hope to have the new results in by the end of April 2025. Do you worry about toxic metals (or other junk) in your food? Where have your fears stemmed from? I'd love to hear from you. You can comment below (no account required) or contact us 😊 ----- Sources The risk of lead contamination in bone broth dietsBone Broth and Lead Toxicity: Should You Be Concerned?Bone Broth and Lead Contamination: A Very Flawed Study in Medical HypothesesBone Broth, Collagen, and Toxic Metals: A Research Review