🎉 NEW soft, tangy, delicious corn & soy free goat chevre! BUY CHEVRE.

How to store and use raw milk with confidence

written by

Marie Reedell

posted on

January 29, 2021

Raw milk is one of the most misunderstood foods. Is it safe? Should I pasteurize it? How do I store it? Let’s see if I can help build your confidence, no matter where you are in your raw milk journey.

You can drink Miller’s Bio Farm milk raw or pasteurized.

People have consumed both raw AND pasteurized milk from different animals for thousands of years. The farmer believes this is absolutely a personal choice.

Most modern folks who choose to drink raw milk do so for the abundant health benefits. If you’re interested in learning more, I recommend checking out www.realmilk.com or www.realmilkinstitute.org.

Most modern folks who choose to drink pasteurized milk do it either as a culinary cultural tradition or because of the fear of potentially dangerous pathogens. 

Using modern technology, Miller’s Bio Farm aims to produce the safest milk possible.

As with any raw food (including lettuce), there’s always a risk of potentially dangerous pathogens. Especially when you are producing raw milk, safety is so very important. 

We go above and beyond to provide you with an ultra low risk product. We utilize modern testing and bottling equipment to do this. You can read more about our milk safety standards here.

If you’re new to raw milk, take it slow.

This is exceptionally important if you eat a diet of “dead” and pasteurized food, which usually results in a struggling digestive system. 

When you start drinking raw milk for the first time, start with a ¼ cup, slowly increasing day by day. This will help your body acclimate to the new beneficial microorganisms you’re introducing.

Store milk in the fridge.

The proper temperature for a fridge is 38-42 F. If you don’t have one already, I recommend getting a simple fridge thermometer. Many are less than $10. Maintaining milk (and all food for that matter) at the proper temperature will help it stay freshest longest.

You can also freeze raw milk.

Raw milk can be frozen for up to 3 months without (major) damage to the enzymes or fat-soluble vitamins. You can freeze milk longer, and it's safe to consume. But, the longer it's frozen, the more probiotic loss.

It’s recommended to freeze milk when fresh, right after you receive it. Make sure to leave at least 1” head room in the bottle to account for expansion when freezing. You can freeze milk in plastic or glass, but there is of course the chance of glass breaking when frozen or while thawing.

When you’re ready to thaw the milk, put it in the fridge and let it thaw completely. Then, shake to recombine the fat.

Raw milk naturally sours over time. The “best buy” date points to the date when we think the milk will be too sour to palate.

The lactase enzyme in raw milk slowly digests the lactose (milk sugar). This is what makes raw milk get slowly more sour over time. This fermentation happens even when the milk is kept sealed in the fridge. The only way to stop it is to pasteurize the milk and kill the lactase.

When the best buy date passes, it doesn’t mean the milk is instantly “bad”. The best buy date is more of an indication of when to expect the milk to be too sour to palate and drink cold in a glass.

If you choose to pasteurize or boil your milk, please do so within the first 3 days of receiving it.​

The longer you wait, the more the milk will sour. The more the milk sours, the greater the chance of having an off putting flavor or separating when heating.

Here are instructions for pasteurizing: (1) Heat milk at 145F in a stainless steel pot for 30 minutes; (2) Remove milk from the heat and put in a sink or a large bowl filled with ice water, stirring constantly until the milk temperature drops to 40F; and (3) Store pasteurized milk in the fridge at 38-42F.

If you’d like, you can reheat pasteurized milk and drink warm.

Have any questions? Need any help? I love helping customers. Contact us here.

Raw Dairy

More from the blog

Raw milk or fermented dairy and lactose intolerance. Why might it help?

I was misinformed. At some point, I read that raw milk contains lactase. As it turns out, this is not true! It is true that raw milk contains many live enzymes that are inactivated during pasteurization. But, what about lactase? I’ve heard many anecdotal stories from people who are lactose intolerant... but can handle raw milk or fermented dairy. If raw milk, yogurt, kefir, or cheese doesn’t contain lactase, then why is that?

Our bone broth tested negative-ish for heavy metals 🥳 NATURAL AND CLEAN

Over the past few months a bunch of people asked us if we tested our bone broth for toxic heavy metals. When we get the same question a lot, we of course look into it. My first question was --- Is there an issue with toxic metals in bone broth? As it turns out, yes, there "can" be an issue! Heavy metals are naturally present in our environment. We need the "good" heavy metals to thrive: iron, zinc, magnesium, copper, etc. But, we can 100% do without the toxic heavy metals: arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury, etc. Too many toxic heavy metals can lead to a host of pretty awful issues: nervous system damage, cardiovascular issues, cancer, endocrine disruption, kidney damage, and so on. Our body is designed to excrete heavy metals through urine (and a little bit through sweat, hair, and breastmilk too)... but only so much. There's a limit. If you're overloaded, your body will store those heavy metals in your bones, blood, tissues, and organs. Similarly, if an animal is exposed to heavy metals via food, water, air, dust, or soil, those heavy metals accumulate in the bones. Maybe the farm's soil or air is contaminated from a nearby factory. Maybe the pipes for the water has lead solder connecting them. Maybe the feed a farm is buying was grown on contaminated soil or processed on contaminated equipment.  And, of course, a main purpose of bone broth is drawing out as much as possible from the bones. If there are heavy metals in bones, they will make their way into the broth. This is especially true when you pre-soak with apple cider vinegar and simmer for 48 hours to make it thick and gelatinous (like our broth). And that led me to my second question --- Should I be concerned about every bone broth? Where is the fear coming from? Well... it seems it might be a little political. There was a study done in the UK in 2013 that scared a lot of people. It's titled "The Risk of Lead Contamination in Bone Broth Diets". This study found high levels of lead in organic chicken bone broth, which is quite concerning. And, in fact, this one study is still cited in articles written today! Let's dig a little deeper. Let's go farther than the short abstract. Here are the broths tested in the study and their test results for lead:  (9.5 parts per billion): Broth made from tap water plus skin and cartilage(7.01 parts per billion): Broth made from tap water plus bones(2.3 parts per billion): Broth made from tap water plus meat(0.89 parts per billion): Tap water alone cooked for the same amount of time as a control. But, they only used organic chicken from one farm. And, there's zero information about that farm, their practices, the feed, and the broth recipe. Did they use vinegar or wine in the broth? Was the chicken's water contaminated with lead? What was the quality of the feed and the soil? Were the chickens raised indoors or outdoors? So many unanswered questions! All we get is that it was one "organic chicken" that created a lead issue with broth. Another curious thing is that the broth with skin and cartilage contained more lead than the broth made with just bones. Bones are where lead is stored, so why wouldn't the broth made with bones only contain more lead? It's an odd result. Moreover, the abstract of the study specifically called out "bone broth diets" like GAPS and paleo. They even go so far as to write, "In view of the dangers of lead consumption to the human body, we recommend that doctors and nutritionists take the risk of lead contamination into consideration when advising patients about bone broth diets." That's quite curious. Why are they worried about these diets? Are the researchers anti healing through food? Who funded the research? Is it political? My opinion? This study is not comprehensive. It does not speak to all bone broths. But it does cover a potential issue if the water or animals are overloaded with heavy metals. What I glean from this study is that we need more research. We don't need fear to spread and people to stop drinking broth from this one study. Regardless of whether the fear was fabricated or legit, we tested our bone broth anyway. After all, it's always nice to validate that your food choices are as clean as you think. For Miller's, here were my concerns before testing: What if there's mercury in the fishmeal in our chicken feed?What if the soil that our animals live on is contaminated?What is the well water that the broth is made with is contaminated?What if the Celtic sea salt has lots of heavy metals? We got the test results back. I was super excited. But, I was also confused. At face value, it appeared that our bone broth tested NEGATIVE for arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury. You can find the test results right here! You'll notice that, for every sample, the results are "<0.01 mg/kg" and "<0.02 mg/kg".  I asked the lab what the "<" means. They said that it indicates their limit of quantitation (LOQ), the lowest concentration that can be accurately tested using the test procedure in that sample type. So the results simply report that none of the metals tested were found in the sample above the specific reporting LOQs. Whether or not they were present below this LOQ is information that is not provided by the test. When talking to the lab, I told them what we needed and assumed that this test would go below a 1 ppb. So, when the results came in, I assumed that a "mg/kg" was the same as a part per billion (ppb). Ummm... that math wasn't write! A "mg/kg" is actually a part per million (ppm). That means that the test we ran had results saying that the broth had less than 0.02 ppm (or 20 ppb) of arsenic and lead. And, it had less than 0.01 ppm (or 10 ppb) of cadmium and mercury. For some reference, the EPA says that less than 15 ppb of lead is safe in drinking water. Not saying that I agree, but it's a good reference point.  These results are good. It means the broth definitely isn't overloaded with toxic heavy metals. But, it's not good enough!!! We need to test again! We really need to a lower LOQ. We need to know the results with an accuracy of as low as 1 ppb. It looks like the lab we sent the original samples to doesn't have an LOQ that low. So here I am on the hunt for a lab to do it again. As soon as I can, I'll send samples in again and paying for more expensive testing to get the info you deserve. Stay tuned! I hope to have the new results in by the end of April 2025. Do you worry about toxic metals (or other junk) in your food? Where have your fears stemmed from? I'd love to hear from you. You can comment below (no account required) or contact us 😊 ----- Sources The risk of lead contamination in bone broth dietsBone Broth and Lead Toxicity: Should You Be Concerned?Bone Broth and Lead Contamination: A Very Flawed Study in Medical HypothesesBone Broth, Collagen, and Toxic Metals: A Research Review