🎉 NEW soft, tangy, delicious corn & soy free goat chevre! BUY CHEVRE.

Separating cream at home. Here are some options and advice for success.

written by

Marie Reedell

posted on

February 9, 2024

skimming-separating-cream.jpg

When we separate our A2/A2 cream, we use big equipment. After all, we're doing it in bulk. It's a fairly straightforward process.

On a large scale, the most common method of taking milk and separating it into cream and skim milk is by using a centrifuge. A machine spins the milk very quickly. The lower density cream stays toward the center, and the higher density skim milk goes toward the outside. Then, there are two pipes for each to go through. Voila! 

But, what if you want to separate the cream from your milk at home? 

Maybe you just want to have some fun in the kitchen. Maybe you want to learn about how to make homemade dairy products at home, like the olden days. Or, maybe you want more self sufficiency (which can sometimes be more affordable, too) and make as much as you can with your own two hands.

An important note is that you can only do this with non-homogenized milk, where the milk fat is unaltered. ALL of our A2/A2 milk is non-homogenized. It's the most natural stuff we can make!

Here are a few methods of separating cream at home:

skimming-cream-with-ladle.jpg

1- Skimming with a ladle.

Pour your milk into a container with a wide mouth. Cover and put it in the fridge. Let it settle for at least 24 hours (depending on the milk, it may take 1-3 days). You will see a clear cream line appear. What happened is that the low density cream floated to the top, leaving the skim milk at the bottom. 

Then, take a ladle or spoon and scoop the cream off the top and transfer it to a separate container.

You need to be very careful with this method. Make sure your ladle scoops cream and only cream. It should not go below that cream line. Also keep in mind that every time your ladle goes in, you are agitating the milk (and therefore diluting the cream). Have a steady hand.

separate-cream-turkey-baster.jpg

2- Slurping it with a turkey baster.

This is similar to above, but a wide mouth container isn't necessary. You need an opening large enough for your turkey baster. 

Let the milk settle in the container until a cream line appears. Then, use your turkey baster to slurp the cream off the top.

Just like above, take care to make sure the baster doesn't go below the cream line. And, maintain tight control to prevent agitation.

milk-dispenser-cream-separating.jpg

3- Draining off the bottom.

Pour your milk into a container with a spout at the bottom (there are some drink dispensers for parties that have this feature). Let it settle in the fridge until the cream line appears. Then, open the spout and let the skim milk drain from the bottom, leaving your amazing cream in the container.

Be careful and watch closely. You want to close the spigot just when the cream line is at the draining level. For this reason, a container with a spigot as low as possible is preferred.

countertop-cream-separator.jpg

4- Using a countertop cream separator.

This is the fanciest, fastest, and most effective of all the options and requires a kitchen gadget: a countertop cream separator (like this one). These separators work the same way our large-scale (old fashioned) cream separator does... but on a smaller scale.

You turn it on, pour milk in, and then cream comes out of one spout and skim milk from the other.

This is the most efficient way to separate cream. If you use cold milk, you'll get heavy cream. And, if you use warm milk (around 101F like when it leaves the cow) on the fastest setting, you'll get super thick cream. It will be spoonable, not pourable. In Europe, they call this "double".

Once you have your cream and skim milk separated, there are so many yummy things to make!

Your thick and rich cream can be made into whipped cream, scones, ice cream, panna cotta, or eggnog. Or how about cooking some eggs in cream? Yum!

Your skim milk can be transformed into ricotta or mozzarella cheese. It's also a fantastic ingredient for baking, sauces, and smoothies.

Have you separated cream at home? What's your favorite method? What do you do with cream at home? 

I'd love to hear from you. Comment below (no account required - start typing for the guest option to appear) or contact us.

More from the blog

Raw milk or fermented dairy and lactose intolerance. Why might it help?

I was misinformed. At some point, I read that raw milk contains lactase. As it turns out, this is not true! It is true that raw milk contains many live enzymes that are inactivated during pasteurization. But, what about lactase? I’ve heard many anecdotal stories from people who are lactose intolerant... but can handle raw milk or fermented dairy. If raw milk, yogurt, kefir, or cheese doesn’t contain lactase, then why is that?

Our bone broth tested negative-ish for heavy metals 🥳 NATURAL AND CLEAN

Over the past few months a bunch of people asked us if we tested our bone broth for toxic heavy metals. When we get the same question a lot, we of course look into it. My first question was --- Is there an issue with toxic metals in bone broth? As it turns out, yes, there "can" be an issue! Heavy metals are naturally present in our environment. We need the "good" heavy metals to thrive: iron, zinc, magnesium, copper, etc. But, we can 100% do without the toxic heavy metals: arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury, etc. Too many toxic heavy metals can lead to a host of pretty awful issues: nervous system damage, cardiovascular issues, cancer, endocrine disruption, kidney damage, and so on. Our body is designed to excrete heavy metals through urine (and a little bit through sweat, hair, and breastmilk too)... but only so much. There's a limit. If you're overloaded, your body will store those heavy metals in your bones, blood, tissues, and organs. Similarly, if an animal is exposed to heavy metals via food, water, air, dust, or soil, those heavy metals accumulate in the bones. Maybe the farm's soil or air is contaminated from a nearby factory. Maybe the pipes for the water has lead solder connecting them. Maybe the feed a farm is buying was grown on contaminated soil or processed on contaminated equipment.  And, of course, a main purpose of bone broth is drawing out as much as possible from the bones. If there are heavy metals in bones, they will make their way into the broth. This is especially true when you pre-soak with apple cider vinegar and simmer for 48 hours to make it thick and gelatinous (like our broth). And that led me to my second question --- Should I be concerned about every bone broth? Where is the fear coming from? Well... it seems it might be a little political. There was a study done in the UK in 2013 that scared a lot of people. It's titled "The Risk of Lead Contamination in Bone Broth Diets". This study found high levels of lead in organic chicken bone broth, which is quite concerning. And, in fact, this one study is still cited in articles written today! Let's dig a little deeper. Let's go farther than the short abstract. Here are the broths tested in the study and their test results for lead:  (9.5 parts per billion): Broth made from tap water plus skin and cartilage(7.01 parts per billion): Broth made from tap water plus bones(2.3 parts per billion): Broth made from tap water plus meat(0.89 parts per billion): Tap water alone cooked for the same amount of time as a control. But, they only used organic chicken from one farm. And, there's zero information about that farm, their practices, the feed, and the broth recipe. Did they use vinegar or wine in the broth? Was the chicken's water contaminated with lead? What was the quality of the feed and the soil? Were the chickens raised indoors or outdoors? So many unanswered questions! All we get is that it was one "organic chicken" that created a lead issue with broth. Another curious thing is that the broth with skin and cartilage contained more lead than the broth made with just bones. Bones are where lead is stored, so why wouldn't the broth made with bones only contain more lead? It's an odd result. Moreover, the abstract of the study specifically called out "bone broth diets" like GAPS and paleo. They even go so far as to write, "In view of the dangers of lead consumption to the human body, we recommend that doctors and nutritionists take the risk of lead contamination into consideration when advising patients about bone broth diets." That's quite curious. Why are they worried about these diets? Are the researchers anti healing through food? Who funded the research? Is it political? My opinion? This study is not comprehensive. It does not speak to all bone broths. But it does cover a potential issue if the water or animals are overloaded with heavy metals. What I glean from this study is that we need more research. We don't need fear to spread and people to stop drinking broth from this one study. Regardless of whether the fear was fabricated or legit, we tested our bone broth anyway. After all, it's always nice to validate that your food choices are as clean as you think. For Miller's, here were my concerns before testing: What if there's mercury in the fishmeal in our chicken feed?What if the soil that our animals live on is contaminated?What is the well water that the broth is made with is contaminated?What if the Celtic sea salt has lots of heavy metals? We got the test results back. I was super excited. But, I was also confused. At face value, it appeared that our bone broth tested NEGATIVE for arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury. You can find the test results right here! You'll notice that, for every sample, the results are "<0.01 mg/kg" and "<0.02 mg/kg".  I asked the lab what the "<" means. They said that it indicates their limit of quantitation (LOQ), the lowest concentration that can be accurately tested using the test procedure in that sample type. So the results simply report that none of the metals tested were found in the sample above the specific reporting LOQs. Whether or not they were present below this LOQ is information that is not provided by the test. When talking to the lab, I told them what we needed and assumed that this test would go below a 1 ppb. So, when the results came in, I assumed that a "mg/kg" was the same as a part per billion (ppb). Ummm... that math wasn't write! A "mg/kg" is actually a part per million (ppm). That means that the test we ran had results saying that the broth had less than 0.02 ppm (or 20 ppb) of arsenic and lead. And, it had less than 0.01 ppm (or 10 ppb) of cadmium and mercury. For some reference, the EPA says that less than 15 ppb of lead is safe in drinking water. Not saying that I agree, but it's a good reference point.  These results are good. It means the broth definitely isn't overloaded with toxic heavy metals. But, it's not good enough!!! We need to test again! We really need to a lower LOQ. We need to know the results with an accuracy of as low as 1 ppb. It looks like the lab we sent the original samples to doesn't have an LOQ that low. So here I am on the hunt for a lab to do it again. As soon as I can, I'll send samples in again and paying for more expensive testing to get the info you deserve. Stay tuned! I hope to have the new results in by the end of April 2025. Do you worry about toxic metals (or other junk) in your food? Where have your fears stemmed from? I'd love to hear from you. You can comment below (no account required) or contact us ðŸ˜Š ----- Sources The risk of lead contamination in bone broth dietsBone Broth and Lead Toxicity: Should You Be Concerned?Bone Broth and Lead Contamination: A Very Flawed Study in Medical HypothesesBone Broth, Collagen, and Toxic Metals: A Research Review