🎉 NEW soft, tangy, delicious corn & soy free goat chevre! BUY CHEVRE.

The inside scoop on one of the meat processors

written by

Marie Reedell

posted on

January 10, 2020

Have you seen the videos exposing terrible meat processing plants? I have, and they’re pretty terrifying and nauseating. 

You know what I’m talking about. Monstrous buildings, overcrowded animals packed together in pens or crates, big conveyor belts with hanging carcasses, big machinery to do odd things like sliding chicks down a chute, and unacceptable conditions and expectations for human employees. 

So, when I visited Aaron, the farmer, a few weeks ago, I was excited and a bit terrified when he offered to take me to visit one of his meat processors - Belmont Meats. 


We were going because I had a car, and Aaron needed to pick up some of his newly processed meat for product pics.

When I got there, my first reaction was, “This is it!?” 


We pulled up to a small well-kept building set amidst acres of pasture. 

We went in around the front. There was a small office and conference area, and we said hi to the folks having a meeting. 

We walked through to the packing room. I saw where they slaughter, butcher, and process the animals. There were about five staff cleaning the butchering room after the day’s work.

The rooms were small and meticulously clean. Even the hanging beef carcasses and discard bins of odd parts were clean. And everything was organized and labeled.

So I guess I need to take a step back. Why was I so surprised by the processor? Well, mainly because it was small and personable, and I was expecting something large and industrial.


It seemed like a really nice place for animals and humans to be. It was physically cold but not mentally cold, if that makes sense. 

You see, it’s really difficult for a small farmer to find a processor to work with. 


Following the USDA guidelines for meat processing is time consuming and expensive. For this reason, most processors are typically large and wouldn’t deal with a measly farmer that sends any less than hundreds of animals at a time.

Belmont Meats has a different strategy. They value quality over quantity, and they want to work with small farmers. 

Belmont Meats treats their animals well, at least for the short time they have them.


Most animals that come are processed that day or the day after. They don’t spend weeks confined and waiting.

They’re fed a natural diet for the few hours they’re in the holding pens. Then, they walk about 50 feet up a short, safe ramp to the room where they are slaughtered.

The conditions at Belmont Meats make for happy employees.


In fact, I know one employee who travels more than two hours to work there during the week. That’s how desirable it is.

It seems laid back and methodical. Every employee does a bit of everything and works together to accomplish a common goal.

Belmont Meats uses all natural ingredients and will work with the USDA to update their special recipes. 


A few examples. They use Redmond salt, which is real and unprocessed. They are also open to recipes with NO sugar. They even allow farmers to drop off their own herbs and spices, if they’d like.

So, if you’re concerned with animal welfare, I am now 100% sure that from start to finish, our animals are treated humanely. 


Belmont Meats is the farmer’s #1 processor for beef, pork, and poultry. The only things they can’t do (yet) is hot dogs and cured products like bacon and ham. The farmer is really looking forward to the day he can work with them for ALL of his meat products. 

If you want to support the cause, check out our 100% grass-fed beef, pastured lamb & goat, pastured woodland pork, and pastured soy-free chicken.

Aaron is serious about ethical farming, and he’s serious about treating his customers with respect. This includes 100% transparency. If you ever have a question, let us know. We’ll do our absolute best to provide an honest, accurate answer ASAP.

Pastured Meat

Farming Practices

More from the blog

Raw milk or fermented dairy and lactose intolerance. Why might it help?

I was misinformed. At some point, I read that raw milk contains lactase. As it turns out, this is not true! It is true that raw milk contains many live enzymes that are inactivated during pasteurization. But, what about lactase? I’ve heard many anecdotal stories from people who are lactose intolerant... but can handle raw milk or fermented dairy. If raw milk, yogurt, kefir, or cheese doesn’t contain lactase, then why is that?

Our bone broth tested negative-ish for heavy metals 🥳 NATURAL AND CLEAN

Over the past few months a bunch of people asked us if we tested our bone broth for toxic heavy metals. When we get the same question a lot, we of course look into it. My first question was --- Is there an issue with toxic metals in bone broth? As it turns out, yes, there "can" be an issue! Heavy metals are naturally present in our environment. We need the "good" heavy metals to thrive: iron, zinc, magnesium, copper, etc. But, we can 100% do without the toxic heavy metals: arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury, etc. Too many toxic heavy metals can lead to a host of pretty awful issues: nervous system damage, cardiovascular issues, cancer, endocrine disruption, kidney damage, and so on. Our body is designed to excrete heavy metals through urine (and a little bit through sweat, hair, and breastmilk too)... but only so much. There's a limit. If you're overloaded, your body will store those heavy metals in your bones, blood, tissues, and organs. Similarly, if an animal is exposed to heavy metals via food, water, air, dust, or soil, those heavy metals accumulate in the bones. Maybe the farm's soil or air is contaminated from a nearby factory. Maybe the pipes for the water has lead solder connecting them. Maybe the feed a farm is buying was grown on contaminated soil or processed on contaminated equipment.  And, of course, a main purpose of bone broth is drawing out as much as possible from the bones. If there are heavy metals in bones, they will make their way into the broth. This is especially true when you pre-soak with apple cider vinegar and simmer for 48 hours to make it thick and gelatinous (like our broth). And that led me to my second question --- Should I be concerned about every bone broth? Where is the fear coming from? Well... it seems it might be a little political. There was a study done in the UK in 2013 that scared a lot of people. It's titled "The Risk of Lead Contamination in Bone Broth Diets". This study found high levels of lead in organic chicken bone broth, which is quite concerning. And, in fact, this one study is still cited in articles written today! Let's dig a little deeper. Let's go farther than the short abstract. Here are the broths tested in the study and their test results for lead:  (9.5 parts per billion): Broth made from tap water plus skin and cartilage(7.01 parts per billion): Broth made from tap water plus bones(2.3 parts per billion): Broth made from tap water plus meat(0.89 parts per billion): Tap water alone cooked for the same amount of time as a control. But, they only used organic chicken from one farm. And, there's zero information about that farm, their practices, the feed, and the broth recipe. Did they use vinegar or wine in the broth? Was the chicken's water contaminated with lead? What was the quality of the feed and the soil? Were the chickens raised indoors or outdoors? So many unanswered questions! All we get is that it was one "organic chicken" that created a lead issue with broth. Another curious thing is that the broth with skin and cartilage contained more lead than the broth made with just bones. Bones are where lead is stored, so why wouldn't the broth made with bones only contain more lead? It's an odd result. Moreover, the abstract of the study specifically called out "bone broth diets" like GAPS and paleo. They even go so far as to write, "In view of the dangers of lead consumption to the human body, we recommend that doctors and nutritionists take the risk of lead contamination into consideration when advising patients about bone broth diets." That's quite curious. Why are they worried about these diets? Are the researchers anti healing through food? Who funded the research? Is it political? My opinion? This study is not comprehensive. It does not speak to all bone broths. But it does cover a potential issue if the water or animals are overloaded with heavy metals. What I glean from this study is that we need more research. We don't need fear to spread and people to stop drinking broth from this one study. Regardless of whether the fear was fabricated or legit, we tested our bone broth anyway. After all, it's always nice to validate that your food choices are as clean as you think. For Miller's, here were my concerns before testing: What if there's mercury in the fishmeal in our chicken feed?What if the soil that our animals live on is contaminated?What is the well water that the broth is made with is contaminated?What if the Celtic sea salt has lots of heavy metals? We got the test results back. I was super excited. But, I was also confused. At face value, it appeared that our bone broth tested NEGATIVE for arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury. You can find the test results right here! You'll notice that, for every sample, the results are "<0.01 mg/kg" and "<0.02 mg/kg".  I asked the lab what the "<" means. They said that it indicates their limit of quantitation (LOQ), the lowest concentration that can be accurately tested using the test procedure in that sample type. So the results simply report that none of the metals tested were found in the sample above the specific reporting LOQs. Whether or not they were present below this LOQ is information that is not provided by the test. When talking to the lab, I told them what we needed and assumed that this test would go below a 1 ppb. So, when the results came in, I assumed that a "mg/kg" was the same as a part per billion (ppb). Ummm... that math wasn't write! A "mg/kg" is actually a part per million (ppm). That means that the test we ran had results saying that the broth had less than 0.02 ppm (or 20 ppb) of arsenic and lead. And, it had less than 0.01 ppm (or 10 ppb) of cadmium and mercury. For some reference, the EPA says that less than 15 ppb of lead is safe in drinking water. Not saying that I agree, but it's a good reference point.  These results are good. It means the broth definitely isn't overloaded with toxic heavy metals. But, it's not good enough!!! We need to test again! We really need to a lower LOQ. We need to know the results with an accuracy of as low as 1 ppb. It looks like the lab we sent the original samples to doesn't have an LOQ that low. So here I am on the hunt for a lab to do it again. As soon as I can, I'll send samples in again and paying for more expensive testing to get the info you deserve. Stay tuned! I hope to have the new results in by the end of April 2025. Do you worry about toxic metals (or other junk) in your food? Where have your fears stemmed from? I'd love to hear from you. You can comment below (no account required) or contact us 😊 ----- Sources The risk of lead contamination in bone broth dietsBone Broth and Lead Toxicity: Should You Be Concerned?Bone Broth and Lead Contamination: A Very Flawed Study in Medical HypothesesBone Broth, Collagen, and Toxic Metals: A Research Review