🎉 NEW soft, tangy, delicious corn & soy free goat chevre! BUY CHEVRE.

The surmountable struggle for USDA certified meat

written by

Marie Reedell

posted on

April 5, 2019

If you are an active member with us, you may have noticed that many of our meat products disappeared in the past month. What’s up with that? Let me explain.

The farmer has been under intense scrutiny recently, and one of the agencies looking into his practices is the USDA. The farmer’s ethical and regenerative farming practices are certainly on point, but the USDA had concern with his meat processors.


You see, as a farmer, you have a good amount of freedom in regard to how you choose to raise your animals. You can choose a natural vs. conventional diet, pasture-raised vs. confined feeding operation, antibiotics vs. homeopathic treatments, and so on.

However, when it comes to processing meat, the USDA is strict.

All of the farmer’s meat products were processed in USDA facilities. However, some of these facilities were not certified for sales across state lines. The farmer is changing that part of his business model.

The farmer has removed all meat products that are not USDA certified for sale across state lines. And, he is switching to processors that are USDA certified for sale across state lines.


Sounds simple, right? Nope.

First, you need to find a small batch USDA processor.


A grand majority of USDA processors are directly aligned with large farming operations. They do not accept small batch animals from small farmers. And, different processors only process certain animals. There are few options for small farmers in regard to USDA.

I should also note that becoming a USDA processor is a costly and time consuming process with lots of paperwork. You need maps, water tests, marketing plans, disposal procedures, town approval, logbooks for everything, product labels, and so on. Everything needs to be approved and inspected. It’s not practical for small-scale operations, except those committed to providing access to real food... and staying in business.

Luckily, our farmer has found smaller local processors who are USDA certified for sales across state lines.

Then, the farmer needs to make sure the processor aligns with (or is willing to accommodate) his real food values.


A processor needs to submit a plan that aligns with the regulations put in place by the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) Working Group. These regulations are designed to reduce dangerous pathogens, reduce food-borne illness, and modernize meat and poultry production.

So, let’s say a processor adds ingredients to meat to make products like sausage or bacon. Those recipes would need to be approved as part of a HACCP plan. So, to avoid questionable and synthetic ingredients like phosphates, nitrates/nitrites, natural flavors, and refinery syrup, a farmer needs to find a processor willing to have natural recipes approved (or willing to use spices provided by the farmer).

So now, the farmer has found his processors. It’s time to iron out the details.


As with embarking on any new endeavor, there will be bumps in the road. For the next few months, the farmer will be working closely with his processors. He needs to ensure they meet his high standards for natural food production as well as having those HACCP plans USDA approved.

You may notice some changes, but please know that these changes are temporary. As always, the farmer strives to provide you the healthiest, most nutrient-dense, most  synthetic-free products possible.

The moral of the story is that nothing is impossible. Albeit challenging, it is possible to work within the government regulations to provide junk-free food to consumers.

So, when is more meat coming back in stock? Here’s what to expect.


Grass-fed Beef - Very soon

Pastured Pork - May 1st

Pastured Poultry - May 15th

Pastured Lamb - July 20th

Pastured Goat - November 30th

The struggle for real food is undoubtedly real. Thanks so much for your ongoing support, especially as the farmer makes this important transition.

Farm Updates

Farming Practices

More from the blog

Raw milk or fermented dairy and lactose intolerance. Why might it help?

I was misinformed. At some point, I read that raw milk contains lactase. As it turns out, this is not true! It is true that raw milk contains many live enzymes that are inactivated during pasteurization. But, what about lactase? I’ve heard many anecdotal stories from people who are lactose intolerant... but can handle raw milk or fermented dairy. If raw milk, yogurt, kefir, or cheese doesn’t contain lactase, then why is that?

Our bone broth tested negative-ish for heavy metals 🥳 NATURAL AND CLEAN

Over the past few months a bunch of people asked us if we tested our bone broth for toxic heavy metals. When we get the same question a lot, we of course look into it. My first question was --- Is there an issue with toxic metals in bone broth? As it turns out, yes, there "can" be an issue! Heavy metals are naturally present in our environment. We need the "good" heavy metals to thrive: iron, zinc, magnesium, copper, etc. But, we can 100% do without the toxic heavy metals: arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury, etc. Too many toxic heavy metals can lead to a host of pretty awful issues: nervous system damage, cardiovascular issues, cancer, endocrine disruption, kidney damage, and so on. Our body is designed to excrete heavy metals through urine (and a little bit through sweat, hair, and breastmilk too)... but only so much. There's a limit. If you're overloaded, your body will store those heavy metals in your bones, blood, tissues, and organs. Similarly, if an animal is exposed to heavy metals via food, water, air, dust, or soil, those heavy metals accumulate in the bones. Maybe the farm's soil or air is contaminated from a nearby factory. Maybe the pipes for the water has lead solder connecting them. Maybe the feed a farm is buying was grown on contaminated soil or processed on contaminated equipment.  And, of course, a main purpose of bone broth is drawing out as much as possible from the bones. If there are heavy metals in bones, they will make their way into the broth. This is especially true when you pre-soak with apple cider vinegar and simmer for 48 hours to make it thick and gelatinous (like our broth). And that led me to my second question --- Should I be concerned about every bone broth? Where is the fear coming from? Well... it seems it might be a little political. There was a study done in the UK in 2013 that scared a lot of people. It's titled "The Risk of Lead Contamination in Bone Broth Diets". This study found high levels of lead in organic chicken bone broth, which is quite concerning. And, in fact, this one study is still cited in articles written today! Let's dig a little deeper. Let's go farther than the short abstract. Here are the broths tested in the study and their test results for lead:  (9.5 parts per billion): Broth made from tap water plus skin and cartilage(7.01 parts per billion): Broth made from tap water plus bones(2.3 parts per billion): Broth made from tap water plus meat(0.89 parts per billion): Tap water alone cooked for the same amount of time as a control. But, they only used organic chicken from one farm. And, there's zero information about that farm, their practices, the feed, and the broth recipe. Did they use vinegar or wine in the broth? Was the chicken's water contaminated with lead? What was the quality of the feed and the soil? Were the chickens raised indoors or outdoors? So many unanswered questions! All we get is that it was one "organic chicken" that created a lead issue with broth. Another curious thing is that the broth with skin and cartilage contained more lead than the broth made with just bones. Bones are where lead is stored, so why wouldn't the broth made with bones only contain more lead? It's an odd result. Moreover, the abstract of the study specifically called out "bone broth diets" like GAPS and paleo. They even go so far as to write, "In view of the dangers of lead consumption to the human body, we recommend that doctors and nutritionists take the risk of lead contamination into consideration when advising patients about bone broth diets." That's quite curious. Why are they worried about these diets? Are the researchers anti healing through food? Who funded the research? Is it political? My opinion? This study is not comprehensive. It does not speak to all bone broths. But it does cover a potential issue if the water or animals are overloaded with heavy metals. What I glean from this study is that we need more research. We don't need fear to spread and people to stop drinking broth from this one study. Regardless of whether the fear was fabricated or legit, we tested our bone broth anyway. After all, it's always nice to validate that your food choices are as clean as you think. For Miller's, here were my concerns before testing: What if there's mercury in the fishmeal in our chicken feed?What if the soil that our animals live on is contaminated?What is the well water that the broth is made with is contaminated?What if the Celtic sea salt has lots of heavy metals? We got the test results back. I was super excited. But, I was also confused. At face value, it appeared that our bone broth tested NEGATIVE for arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury. You can find the test results right here! You'll notice that, for every sample, the results are "<0.01 mg/kg" and "<0.02 mg/kg".  I asked the lab what the "<" means. They said that it indicates their limit of quantitation (LOQ), the lowest concentration that can be accurately tested using the test procedure in that sample type. So the results simply report that none of the metals tested were found in the sample above the specific reporting LOQs. Whether or not they were present below this LOQ is information that is not provided by the test. When talking to the lab, I told them what we needed and assumed that this test would go below a 1 ppb. So, when the results came in, I assumed that a "mg/kg" was the same as a part per billion (ppb). Ummm... that math wasn't write! A "mg/kg" is actually a part per million (ppm). That means that the test we ran had results saying that the broth had less than 0.02 ppm (or 20 ppb) of arsenic and lead. And, it had less than 0.01 ppm (or 10 ppb) of cadmium and mercury. For some reference, the EPA says that less than 15 ppb of lead is safe in drinking water. Not saying that I agree, but it's a good reference point.  These results are good. It means the broth definitely isn't overloaded with toxic heavy metals. But, it's not good enough!!! We need to test again! We really need to a lower LOQ. We need to know the results with an accuracy of as low as 1 ppb. It looks like the lab we sent the original samples to doesn't have an LOQ that low. So here I am on the hunt for a lab to do it again. As soon as I can, I'll send samples in again and paying for more expensive testing to get the info you deserve. Stay tuned! I hope to have the new results in by the end of April 2025. Do you worry about toxic metals (or other junk) in your food? Where have your fears stemmed from? I'd love to hear from you. You can comment below (no account required) or contact us 😊 ----- Sources The risk of lead contamination in bone broth dietsBone Broth and Lead Toxicity: Should You Be Concerned?Bone Broth and Lead Contamination: A Very Flawed Study in Medical HypothesesBone Broth, Collagen, and Toxic Metals: A Research Review