🎉 NEW soft, tangy, delicious corn & soy free goat chevre! BUY CHEVRE.

Announcing CORN AND SOY FREE chicken. It's possible and it's finally here!

written by

Marie Reedell

posted on

June 10, 2022

It’s been in the works for over a year…. and now CORN AND SOY FREE chicken is officially here. Here’s more about why we did it and the struggles we’ve had to get it to you.

Corn and Soy and Food Allergies

One of our amazing customers passed me a link to a TEDxAustin talk by Robyn O’Brien. It’s from 2011, so this is really nothing new. But, Robyn’s story so wonderfully put the reasoning behind going corn and soy free into perspective.

You can watch her talk here and read my quick recap below. 

Robyn O’Brien is a Food Industry Analyst. Eventually, she traded her job for a diaper bag. Four kids later and despite her food industry expertise, she still hadn’t given much thought about what was in the food supply. 

Robyn grew up in Texas and ate “normal food”. You know, “foods” like Twinkies and Doritos and chicken nuggets.

“I figured, if it was on grocery store shelves, it was safe. Don’t tell me what to eat. And, please, don’t tell me what to feed my kids,” Robyn said.

Between picky eaters and a limited budget, food shopping and meal planning can be a challenge. She was perfectly ok feeding her family Eggo waffles, tubes of blue yogurt, and scrambled eggs for breakfast. I mean, her kids ate it.

Until one morning, at breakfast, life changed. Her child had an allergic reaction.

Her daughter’s face started to swell shut, and she immediately brought her to the pediatrician. The doctor’s first question was, “What did she eat?” Her pediatrician knew that it was an allergic reaction to food and started rattling off all these facts and figures about food allergies.

Robyn thought, “How could kids be allergic to food?!?!” She needed to learn more. I mean, she didn’t know anyone with a food allergy when she was a kid. How could it be so common now?

She learned that from 1997 to 2002, peanut allergies doubled. She learned that, as of 2011, one out of three kids had a food allergy. And, she learned that there had been a 265% increase in the rate of hospitalizations related to food allergic reactions. 

In short, food allergies are a BIG problem now. And, we’re not even talking about food intolerances.

A food allergy is when your body sees food proteins as foreign and then launches an inflammatory response to fight off and drive out that foreign invader. 

Robyn wondered, “Is there something foreign in our food now that wasn’t there when we were kids?” 

So, she turned to the USDA and learned that, beginning in the 1990s, new proteins were bioengineered into our food supply. Yup, she’s talking about GMOs.

This was done to maximize profitability for the food industry. I mean, it makes perfect financial sense… at least for the big corporations. Greater yields + lower inputs = cheaper food + more profit.

But, at the same time, no studies were done to see if these new proteins were safe. The government’s explanation is that these new bioengineered foods weren’t proven dangerous. But why not flip that? Why allow something new into the food supply until it’s proven safe? (This is a giant topic for another day.)

Today, there are new bioengineered proteins in basically all mainstream foods. You might think, well, it’s just milk or meat or eggs. But, the animals that produce those foods are likely fed bioengineered corn and soy, which results in these new foreign proteins appearing in the final product.

New products and proteins are created all the time. It’s so hard to avoid. You can learn more about the new bioengineered labeling here

These new proteins increase the chance of allergies, cancers, and numerous other chronic conditions and diseases.

So, if you already have food allergies in your family or would like to avoid food allergies in your family, limiting corn and soy consumption… directly or via the feed that’s given to animals that produce your food… is probably a good idea.

Farming Without Corn & Soy 

Miller’s Bio Farm’s purpose is to inspire a generation of healthy children and reduce healthcare costs. So, of course, with the knowledge of allergies and disease linked to corn and soy, we try our best to minimize it. However, it doesn’t come without struggles, especially when it comes to raising chickens.

Even when chickens live out on pasture and can eat all the crickets and worms and greens they want, they still need supplemental feed when farmed for meat. It’s necessary. This is so they can grow to full size and be harvested when tender. Without some feed, we’d only be able to offer you old stewing hens. 

There’s a myth amongst farmers - you can’t raise chickens without corn and soy. It’s almost as if farmers believe that it’s impossible to raise chickens without it.

You see, soy and corn are used to fatten livestock. It makes it so that you need less feed and the animals grow to full size more quickly. It’s cheaper. It’s easier. I get why most farmers do it.

Farmer Aaron used to believe the same thing… until he switched to a soy-free feed. Honestly, it wasn’t great at first.

The soy was replaced with fishmeal. And then, the chicken tasted fishy, which was quite off putting. It took a few rounds of playing with the feed rationing until the perfect balance was achieved. 

Plus, it costs more to raise chickens this way. They required more feed and more time to grow. Farmer Aaron didn’t know how an increase in feed cost would affect his cash flow (always a challenge for a farmer).

He also didn’t know how customers would respond to a price increase. Would he fill his freezer with chicken, and then have no one to sell it to? Well, it turns out that there’s a big demand for soy-free chicken, despite the cost!

The next challenge was taking it one step further - soy AND corn free feed. Again, farmer Aaron used to think it wasn’t possible. Regardless, because of our awesome customers requesting it, he went for it anyway.

And again he went through the same struggles - it changed the taste and it cost too much. However, this time around, armed with his knowledge from going soy-free, the farm worked through those challenges a bit more quickly.

Our chicken feed now contains a specially formulated blend of wheat, peas, barley, fishmeal (from sardines), flax seed, kelp, and a nutri-balancer which has kelp, vitamins, and minerals. Side note: Dried bugs and larvae are also an option for chicken feed, but they are more expensive than fishmeal.

It’s been almost a year since the farm first started feeding its chickens a corn and soy free feed. We’ve been selling older soy-free chicken. And now, we’ve worked our way to the new chicken inventory.

We’re thrilled to announce that (almost) all of our chicken is CORN AND SOY FREE! 

We still have some older 6-7lb whole birds and ground chicken that’s soy free only. It’s clearly labeled in the store, so it’s easy for you to tell the difference.

Do you have food allergies or fear them? Why do you or do you not avoid corn and soy? If you do consume corn or soy, do you have specific requirements for how it’s grown?

I’d love to hear from you. Comment on the blog below (no account required -- start typing and you'll see that option) or contact us.

PS: Our eggs are also corn & soy free now! Sadly, we only have duck eggs available now. The chicken egg farmer is transitioning to a new flock, and we’re waiting for them to start laying. Come on, chickens! Hopefully they will be back before the end of the month.

Health and Nutrition

Farming Practices

More from the blog

Raw milk or fermented dairy and lactose intolerance. Why might it help?

I was misinformed. At some point, I read that raw milk contains lactase. As it turns out, this is not true! It is true that raw milk contains many live enzymes that are inactivated during pasteurization. But, what about lactase? I’ve heard many anecdotal stories from people who are lactose intolerant... but can handle raw milk or fermented dairy. If raw milk, yogurt, kefir, or cheese doesn’t contain lactase, then why is that?

Our bone broth tested negative-ish for heavy metals 🥳 NATURAL AND CLEAN

Over the past few months a bunch of people asked us if we tested our bone broth for toxic heavy metals. When we get the same question a lot, we of course look into it. My first question was --- Is there an issue with toxic metals in bone broth? As it turns out, yes, there "can" be an issue! Heavy metals are naturally present in our environment. We need the "good" heavy metals to thrive: iron, zinc, magnesium, copper, etc. But, we can 100% do without the toxic heavy metals: arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury, etc. Too many toxic heavy metals can lead to a host of pretty awful issues: nervous system damage, cardiovascular issues, cancer, endocrine disruption, kidney damage, and so on. Our body is designed to excrete heavy metals through urine (and a little bit through sweat, hair, and breastmilk too)... but only so much. There's a limit. If you're overloaded, your body will store those heavy metals in your bones, blood, tissues, and organs. Similarly, if an animal is exposed to heavy metals via food, water, air, dust, or soil, those heavy metals accumulate in the bones. Maybe the farm's soil or air is contaminated from a nearby factory. Maybe the pipes for the water has lead solder connecting them. Maybe the feed a farm is buying was grown on contaminated soil or processed on contaminated equipment.  And, of course, a main purpose of bone broth is drawing out as much as possible from the bones. If there are heavy metals in bones, they will make their way into the broth. This is especially true when you pre-soak with apple cider vinegar and simmer for 48 hours to make it thick and gelatinous (like our broth). And that led me to my second question --- Should I be concerned about every bone broth? Where is the fear coming from? Well... it seems it might be a little political. There was a study done in the UK in 2013 that scared a lot of people. It's titled "The Risk of Lead Contamination in Bone Broth Diets". This study found high levels of lead in organic chicken bone broth, which is quite concerning. And, in fact, this one study is still cited in articles written today! Let's dig a little deeper. Let's go farther than the short abstract. Here are the broths tested in the study and their test results for lead:  (9.5 parts per billion): Broth made from tap water plus skin and cartilage(7.01 parts per billion): Broth made from tap water plus bones(2.3 parts per billion): Broth made from tap water plus meat(0.89 parts per billion): Tap water alone cooked for the same amount of time as a control. But, they only used organic chicken from one farm. And, there's zero information about that farm, their practices, the feed, and the broth recipe. Did they use vinegar or wine in the broth? Was the chicken's water contaminated with lead? What was the quality of the feed and the soil? Were the chickens raised indoors or outdoors? So many unanswered questions! All we get is that it was one "organic chicken" that created a lead issue with broth. Another curious thing is that the broth with skin and cartilage contained more lead than the broth made with just bones. Bones are where lead is stored, so why wouldn't the broth made with bones only contain more lead? It's an odd result. Moreover, the abstract of the study specifically called out "bone broth diets" like GAPS and paleo. They even go so far as to write, "In view of the dangers of lead consumption to the human body, we recommend that doctors and nutritionists take the risk of lead contamination into consideration when advising patients about bone broth diets." That's quite curious. Why are they worried about these diets? Are the researchers anti healing through food? Who funded the research? Is it political? My opinion? This study is not comprehensive. It does not speak to all bone broths. But it does cover a potential issue if the water or animals are overloaded with heavy metals. What I glean from this study is that we need more research. We don't need fear to spread and people to stop drinking broth from this one study. Regardless of whether the fear was fabricated or legit, we tested our bone broth anyway. After all, it's always nice to validate that your food choices are as clean as you think. For Miller's, here were my concerns before testing: What if there's mercury in the fishmeal in our chicken feed?What if the soil that our animals live on is contaminated?What is the well water that the broth is made with is contaminated?What if the Celtic sea salt has lots of heavy metals? We got the test results back. I was super excited. But, I was also confused. At face value, it appeared that our bone broth tested NEGATIVE for arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury. You can find the test results right here! You'll notice that, for every sample, the results are "<0.01 mg/kg" and "<0.02 mg/kg".  I asked the lab what the "<" means. They said that it indicates their limit of quantitation (LOQ), the lowest concentration that can be accurately tested using the test procedure in that sample type. So the results simply report that none of the metals tested were found in the sample above the specific reporting LOQs. Whether or not they were present below this LOQ is information that is not provided by the test. When talking to the lab, I told them what we needed and assumed that this test would go below a 1 ppb. So, when the results came in, I assumed that a "mg/kg" was the same as a part per billion (ppb). Ummm... that math wasn't write! A "mg/kg" is actually a part per million (ppm). That means that the test we ran had results saying that the broth had less than 0.02 ppm (or 20 ppb) of arsenic and lead. And, it had less than 0.01 ppm (or 10 ppb) of cadmium and mercury. For some reference, the EPA says that less than 15 ppb of lead is safe in drinking water. Not saying that I agree, but it's a good reference point.  These results are good. It means the broth definitely isn't overloaded with toxic heavy metals. But, it's not good enough!!! We need to test again! We really need to a lower LOQ. We need to know the results with an accuracy of as low as 1 ppb. It looks like the lab we sent the original samples to doesn't have an LOQ that low. So here I am on the hunt for a lab to do it again. As soon as I can, I'll send samples in again and paying for more expensive testing to get the info you deserve. Stay tuned! I hope to have the new results in by the end of April 2025. Do you worry about toxic metals (or other junk) in your food? Where have your fears stemmed from? I'd love to hear from you. You can comment below (no account required) or contact us 😊 ----- Sources The risk of lead contamination in bone broth dietsBone Broth and Lead Toxicity: Should You Be Concerned?Bone Broth and Lead Contamination: A Very Flawed Study in Medical HypothesesBone Broth, Collagen, and Toxic Metals: A Research Review