🎉 NEW soft, tangy, delicious corn & soy free goat chevre! BUY CHEVRE.

Ever wonder why our food costs more? Here are the 5 big reasons why.

written by

Marie Reedell

posted on

August 2, 2024

farm-shelves-food-selection.jpg

Ever wonder why our food costs more? It costs more than most supermarket food (even the organic stuff). And, when you compare to other farms, it often costs more, too. 

Here are 5 big reasons why:

1- We have super high standards. 

We do this in sooo many ways. Here are what I think are the most notable ones:

  • Our farmers pay close attention to soil health in their naturally regenerated pastures. This usually includes yearly soil testing and amending the soil for specific things to create the the healthiest soil, plants, animals, and food for you.
  • Our farmers farm regeneratively. This requires a lot more land than feedlot animals. For example, to raise beef cattle regeneratively on pasture, you need about an acre per cow. Compare that to indoor beef cattle, which require about 200-500 square feet per cow (that's about 1% of an acre). 
  • Our feed isn't any old feed. Our feed suppliers source locally as much as possible from farms they know and trust. And, if they buy in, they are getting organic ingredients. It's not just "GMO-free".
  • We take milk safety very seriously. We go above and beyond what's required. We have meticulous cleaning standards, which makes our raw milk last longer than most. Plus, we test every batch of cow milk on site for general bacteria counts to ensure the cleaning is happening (read more here).
  • All of our packaging is as sustainable as possible. We offer foods in glass. If in plastic, it's the kind with the least potential for toxins and leaching. When we pack an order, most of what we use is compostable (and if not it's recyclable or drain safe).

We consider the nitty gritty details, from the soil to your door. This means you get the most pure and nutrient dense foods possible.

2- Everything is corn & soy free. 

The norm is that animals are fed corn & soy, because they're cheap (and subsidized, too). Although they're cheap to grow, they also deplete soil. So they're cheap now... but will cause expensive problems later.

Corn and soy are high in PUFAs and are particularly omega 6 fatty acids. Eliminating this from the animal feed creates low PUFA, balanced omega foods for you. This has in fact been tested with our chicken, which has a perfect 1:1 omega 6/3 ratio (read more here).

And finally corn and soy have become big allergens. I've heard anecdotally from customers with severe allergies that they can handle our corn & soy free food but not others. And, if you're not allergic to corn or soy, removing it from our food also prevents potential allergies for you later. After all, allergies typically develop over time (read more here).

3- We pay our farmers fairly. 

We believe that farmers should be able to make a living farming and NOT need a second job off the farm. 

Did you know that 80%+ of income of US farm households comes from sources other than farming? This is starkly different from the 1970s, when only 37% of farmers held a primary job off the farm. It's on the rise, and it just keeps getting worse. Farmers are notorious for not making money. At the end of the year, it's not uncommon to take a loss.

Not our farmers! We want them to be paid fairly. The rates we pay are definitely higher than coops or mega companies. And, they're also higher than any competitor we know.

4- We watch our finances very closely. 

Our prices are set based on the actual cost to produce a certain food. We want to be as financially sustainable as we are environmentally sustainable, so we can be a reliable food source for you.

This is different from how we did things years ago, when prices were set by what our competitors were asking. And that led to a big issue. The farm thought it needed more sales, so we worked hard and got them. Yet, the farm was still in the red, losing money. Why? Well of course no matter how much you sell, if it's not profitable, it really doesn't matter.

So we set prices exactly. And we get complaints about it sometimes. The biggest example I can think of is with cream and butter. Here's the breakdown:

It takes 1 gallon of milk to make about 1-1.5 pints of cream. And then it takes 1 quart (2 pints) of cream to churn 1lb of butter. So, it takes at least 2 gallons of milk to make 1lb of butter. And then there's the labor and the packaging, too. 

5- We roll (almost all) of the cost of delivery into the product prices. 

This is how we can offer free delivery over certain amounts in the eastern half of the US. I mean, even though there's really no such thing as "free" delivery (you're paying for it one way or another), people just love free delivery - thanks, Amazon.

This is why the closer you live, the better the prices. And this is why we ask you to create an account and choose a delivery option before viewing prices.

The second reason we like it is because it makes it easier for you to shop. We're not making it seem like our food is affordable and then having mega fees at checkout. We try to roll it in so you know how much each item costs before checkout. It's easier to shop within a budget.

Wish you could afford our food... but can't?

Gee, how I wish our food was affordable for everyone! I mean, Miller's food should just be the norm. But, the reality is that we live in a messed up food world where pure, clean food has now become special.

On the other hand, how Americans spend has also changed. In 1947, the average household spent 24% of income on food from the store. Today, it's just 7%. Our priorities as a society have shifted. Instead of buying high quality food, we spend more on things like bigger houses, air conditioning, vacations, nice cars, and technology. 

All this being said, if budget is a concern, my recommendation is to switch out one food to buy farm direct. Maybe it's milk or eggs or ground beef. It's somewhere to start as life unfolds your next chapter.

Every feel guilty about spending more on food than most can afford? 

In my opinion, you shouldn't. Because, when you buy food like Miller's, you're not just eating... you're supporting causes at the same time. You can read more about the 7 impacts you make by buying farm-direct.

Why do you spend more on food? What is the #1 most important reason you shop with Miller's?

I'd love to hear from you. Comment below ⬇️

-----

Sources

More from the blog

Raw milk or fermented dairy and lactose intolerance. Why might it help?

I was misinformed. At some point, I read that raw milk contains lactase. As it turns out, this is not true! It is true that raw milk contains many live enzymes that are inactivated during pasteurization. But, what about lactase? I’ve heard many anecdotal stories from people who are lactose intolerant... but can handle raw milk or fermented dairy. If raw milk, yogurt, kefir, or cheese doesn’t contain lactase, then why is that?

Our bone broth tested negative-ish for heavy metals 🥳 NATURAL AND CLEAN

Over the past few months a bunch of people asked us if we tested our bone broth for toxic heavy metals. When we get the same question a lot, we of course look into it. My first question was --- Is there an issue with toxic metals in bone broth? As it turns out, yes, there "can" be an issue! Heavy metals are naturally present in our environment. We need the "good" heavy metals to thrive: iron, zinc, magnesium, copper, etc. But, we can 100% do without the toxic heavy metals: arsenic, cadmium, lead, mercury, etc. Too many toxic heavy metals can lead to a host of pretty awful issues: nervous system damage, cardiovascular issues, cancer, endocrine disruption, kidney damage, and so on. Our body is designed to excrete heavy metals through urine (and a little bit through sweat, hair, and breastmilk too)... but only so much. There's a limit. If you're overloaded, your body will store those heavy metals in your bones, blood, tissues, and organs. Similarly, if an animal is exposed to heavy metals via food, water, air, dust, or soil, those heavy metals accumulate in the bones. Maybe the farm's soil or air is contaminated from a nearby factory. Maybe the pipes for the water has lead solder connecting them. Maybe the feed a farm is buying was grown on contaminated soil or processed on contaminated equipment.  And, of course, a main purpose of bone broth is drawing out as much as possible from the bones. If there are heavy metals in bones, they will make their way into the broth. This is especially true when you pre-soak with apple cider vinegar and simmer for 48 hours to make it thick and gelatinous (like our broth). And that led me to my second question --- Should I be concerned about every bone broth? Where is the fear coming from? Well... it seems it might be a little political. There was a study done in the UK in 2013 that scared a lot of people. It's titled "The Risk of Lead Contamination in Bone Broth Diets". This study found high levels of lead in organic chicken bone broth, which is quite concerning. And, in fact, this one study is still cited in articles written today! Let's dig a little deeper. Let's go farther than the short abstract. Here are the broths tested in the study and their test results for lead:  (9.5 parts per billion): Broth made from tap water plus skin and cartilage(7.01 parts per billion): Broth made from tap water plus bones(2.3 parts per billion): Broth made from tap water plus meat(0.89 parts per billion): Tap water alone cooked for the same amount of time as a control. But, they only used organic chicken from one farm. And, there's zero information about that farm, their practices, the feed, and the broth recipe. Did they use vinegar or wine in the broth? Was the chicken's water contaminated with lead? What was the quality of the feed and the soil? Were the chickens raised indoors or outdoors? So many unanswered questions! All we get is that it was one "organic chicken" that created a lead issue with broth. Another curious thing is that the broth with skin and cartilage contained more lead than the broth made with just bones. Bones are where lead is stored, so why wouldn't the broth made with bones only contain more lead? It's an odd result. Moreover, the abstract of the study specifically called out "bone broth diets" like GAPS and paleo. They even go so far as to write, "In view of the dangers of lead consumption to the human body, we recommend that doctors and nutritionists take the risk of lead contamination into consideration when advising patients about bone broth diets." That's quite curious. Why are they worried about these diets? Are the researchers anti healing through food? Who funded the research? Is it political? My opinion? This study is not comprehensive. It does not speak to all bone broths. But it does cover a potential issue if the water or animals are overloaded with heavy metals. What I glean from this study is that we need more research. We don't need fear to spread and people to stop drinking broth from this one study. Regardless of whether the fear was fabricated or legit, we tested our bone broth anyway. After all, it's always nice to validate that your food choices are as clean as you think. For Miller's, here were my concerns before testing: What if there's mercury in the fishmeal in our chicken feed?What if the soil that our animals live on is contaminated?What is the well water that the broth is made with is contaminated?What if the Celtic sea salt has lots of heavy metals? We got the test results back. I was super excited. But, I was also confused. At face value, it appeared that our bone broth tested NEGATIVE for arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury. You can find the test results right here! You'll notice that, for every sample, the results are "<0.01 mg/kg" and "<0.02 mg/kg".  I asked the lab what the "<" means. They said that it indicates their limit of quantitation (LOQ), the lowest concentration that can be accurately tested using the test procedure in that sample type. So the results simply report that none of the metals tested were found in the sample above the specific reporting LOQs. Whether or not they were present below this LOQ is information that is not provided by the test. When talking to the lab, I told them what we needed and assumed that this test would go below a 1 ppb. So, when the results came in, I assumed that a "mg/kg" was the same as a part per billion (ppb). Ummm... that math wasn't write! A "mg/kg" is actually a part per million (ppm). That means that the test we ran had results saying that the broth had less than 0.02 ppm (or 20 ppb) of arsenic and lead. And, it had less than 0.01 ppm (or 10 ppb) of cadmium and mercury. For some reference, the EPA says that less than 15 ppb of lead is safe in drinking water. Not saying that I agree, but it's a good reference point.  These results are good. It means the broth definitely isn't overloaded with toxic heavy metals. But, it's not good enough!!! We need to test again! We really need to a lower LOQ. We need to know the results with an accuracy of as low as 1 ppb. It looks like the lab we sent the original samples to doesn't have an LOQ that low. So here I am on the hunt for a lab to do it again. As soon as I can, I'll send samples in again and paying for more expensive testing to get the info you deserve. Stay tuned! I hope to have the new results in by the end of April 2025. Do you worry about toxic metals (or other junk) in your food? Where have your fears stemmed from? I'd love to hear from you. You can comment below (no account required) or contact us 😊 ----- Sources The risk of lead contamination in bone broth dietsBone Broth and Lead Toxicity: Should You Be Concerned?Bone Broth and Lead Contamination: A Very Flawed Study in Medical HypothesesBone Broth, Collagen, and Toxic Metals: A Research Review